« Iraq Briefing - 11 August 2009 - Breaking the Cycle of Sectarian Violence | Main | Alinsky's Rule 12: Destroy the Individual »

August 15, 2009

The "Nazi/president" Selective Outrage of the Left

Sister Toldjah asks

Since when the hell did the MSM ever give a damn about Hitler comparisons?

If you're like me, you're pretty disgusted and close to nauseous over hearing the repeated "outrage" from the mainstream mediots about the alleged comparisons the "mobsters" at the ObamaCare town halls are making between Hitler and Obama. Ever since Pelosi's "swastika" crack, the MSM (and their cohorts at far left liberal blogs) have been scouring town halls across the country looking for any evidence whatsoever of signs made by alleged "conservative mobsters" featuring swastikas and/or images of Hitler and Obama together, in desperate attempts to prove how diehard conservatives have supposedly "lost it" over Obama and thus should be ignored when it comes to the discussion and debate over ObamaCare.

As the sister relates, it was Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer started all this earlier this week when she called critics of Obama's health care plan "un-American, and even accused them of "carrying swastikas and symbols like that" to meetings.

Liberals also have their panties on a wad over comments Rush Limbaugh made, and pull out the "how dare anyone call Obama a socialist!" meme.

Oh the outrage. Nevermind that Rush didn't say Obama was equivalent to Hitler or Pelosi Himmler. What he said was that socialist health care in Germany was started by Bismark and completed by the Nazis, and that the Democrats are doing the same thing. Historically he's right. But whether you like that or not, these same liberals weren't so outraged during years of "Bushitler" hate.

Like, oh, this one via Michelle Malkin:

Or these, which you can find simply by googling for "Bushitler" while set on "images:

Bushitler1


Bushitler2


bushitler3


Not to mention this video of protesters with Bush-Nazi signs at Bush's second inauguration


Recall any outrage over this?

Zombietime has about a zillion photos of Bush-as-Hitler from various leftist protests. Where was the media outrage then?

For that matter, I've seen tons of Bush-the-Nazi signs in every anti-war protest I observed in Washington DC over the past four years. Pictures are all over the internet.

Now, I'll never say that conservatives are saints. Too many buy into the Barack Obama birth certificate nonsense. And when we actly badly it is reported gleefully by the press. All we're asking for is some even-handedness.

Bill Sammon of Fox News relates how the press ignored these constant references to Bush as Hitler:

News outlets that are focusing on the incendiary rhetoric of conservatives outside President Obama's town hall meeting Tuesday ignored the incendiary rhetoric -- and even violence -- of liberals outside an appearance by former President George W. Bush in 2002.

When Bush visited Portland, Ore., for a fundraiser, protesters stalked his motorcade, assailed his limousine and stoned a car containing his advisers. Chanting "Bush is a terrorist!", the demonstrators bullied passers-by, including gay softball players and a wheelchair-bound grandfather with multiple sclerosis.

One protester even brandished a sign that seemed to advocate Bush's assassination. The man held a large photo of Bush that had been doctored to show a gun barrel pressed against his temple.

"BUSH: WANTED, DEAD OR ALIVE," read the placard, which had an X over the word "ALIVE."

Another poster showed Bush's face with the words: "F--- YOU, MOTHERF---ER!"

A third sign urged motorists to "HONK IF YOU HATE BUSH." A fourth declared: "CHRISTIAN FASCISM," with a swastika in place of the letter S in each word.

Although reporters from numerous national news organizations were traveling with Bush and witnessed the protest, none reported that protesters were shrieking at Republican donors epithets like "Slut!" "Whore!" and "Fascists!"

Frank Dulcich, president and CEO of Pacific Seafood Group, had a cup of liquid thrown into his face, and then was surrounded by a group of menacing protesters, including several who wore masks. Donald Tykeson, 75, who had multiple sclerosis and was confined to a wheelchair, was blocked by a thug who threatened him.

Protesters slashed the tires of several state patrol cruisers and leapt onto an occupied police car, slamming the hood and blocking the windshield with placards. A female police officer was knocked to the street by advancing protesters, badly injuring her wrist.

The angry protest grew so violent that the Secret Service was forced to take the highly unusual step of using a backup route for Bush's motorcade because the primary route had been compromised by protesters, one of whom pounded his fist on the president's moving limousine.

All the while, angry demonstrators brandished signs with incendiary rhetoric, such as "9/11 - YOU LET IT HAPPEN, SHRUB," and "BUSH: BASTARD CHILD OF THE SUPREME COURT." One sign read: "IMPEACH THE COURT-APPOINTED JUNTA AND THE FASCIST, EGOMANIACAL, BLOOD-SWILLING BEAST!"

Yet none of these signs were cited in the national media's coverage of the event. By contrast, the press focused extensively on over-the-top signs held by Obama critics at the president's town hall event held Tuesday in New Hampshire.

The lead story in Wednesday's Washington Post, for example, is headlined: "Obama Faces 'Scare Tactics' Head-On."

"As the president spoke, demonstrators outside held posters declaring him a socialist and dubbing him 'Obamahdinejad,' in reference to Iran's president," the Post reported. "People screamed into bullhorns to protest a bigger government role in health care. 'Nobama Deathcare!' one sign read. A young girl held up a sign that said: 'Obama Lies, Grandma Dies.' Images of a protester wearing what appeared to be a gun were shown on television."

On Sunday, The New York Times reported that a Democratic congressman discovered that "an opponent of health care reform hanged him in effigy" and was confronted by "200 angry conservatives." The article lamented "increasingly ugly scenes of partisan screaming matches, scuffles, threats and even arrests."

No such coverage was given to the Portland protest of Bush by The New York Times or the Washington Post, which witnessed the protest.

But if anyone shows up at a conservative protest with one sign that's out of place, and the media and liberal politicians go nuts.

Sorry, but I'm having a hard time taking the liberal outrage seriously.

Posted by Tom at August 15, 2009 9:00 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/1423

Comments

I probably shouldn't say the following, and you can feel free to delete or not to punish.

The left's selective outrage as outlined in this post makes me think of an old saying: "That's the pot calling the kettle black."

Now, I'm not much on name-calling, and the whoever/Hitler motif is overused, IMO. But it seems to me that that left started this cycle with GWB and even manipulated the electorate with the tactic as a tool of demagoguery.

So here's another saying, which doesn't smack of racism (I have repeatedly stated my views as to white supremacy, which I oppose as an ideology): "What goes around comes around."

Posted by: Always On Watch at August 16, 2009 8:37 AM

All this ad hominum stuff is out of control.

OK, so you and Rush say that Bismarck (and the Nazis) where the first to instate workers compensation for people injured on the job under the
Unfallversicherungsgesetz (1884) [Accident Insurance Act], which is true. So, with this ad hominum attack, should we then elimante workers compensation, and the government provision of pension and medical benfits for disabled veterans because Bismarck (and the Nazis) also did this? This is just as bad as the left wing idiots who called bush a Nazi, when their real problem was the way he initiated the Iraq war, tax cuts for the rich or whatever. Instead of debated specifc details, they resorted to name calling.

The problem with this name calling is that it subsitutes labels for facts. Really, calling it "Obamacare" and decrying the "socialist health care" of Bismarck is childish, unless you are zealously commited to the free market idealogy and think disabled veterans or workers injured on the job should not recieve one dime from the government, and the invisible hand of the free market should provide care for our disabled vets (I know you don't believe in this foolish idea). But if you really want to discredit an idea because other "socialists" or other bad people did it, maybe we should cancel other "socialist" programs like FDIC insurance, product safety standards (which there are none to little here in China, just like there is no social security system here either) or auto insurance.

These ad hominum attacks don't really help, whichever side does them, whether it is the left calling Bush a Nazi or Rush belly-aching about Bismarck (when he would never be so stupid as to actually advocate the rolling back of the actual reforms Bismarck instituted, either related to veterans or injured workers.) But name calling makes for good ratings, so the nature of the political debate in America becomes cheaper and less productive....

In an interesting side note, I am currently in "Red China", where the internet censors will allow me to access your blog, but not mine. I can use the internet to read news about unrest in Tibet, the National Review, criticism of the Chinese communist government, corruption in the Chinese government, and I even read an article in the state run newspaper in opposition to internet censorship, but I cannot get to youtube, facebook or a wordpress blog.

Posted by: jason at August 18, 2009 6:23 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)