« Iranians Protest: Obama is AWOL Again | Main | Napolitano Changes Her Tune, More Questions About Security Than Answers »
December 27, 2009
Christmas Day Terror in the Skies Averted No Thanks to Homeland Security
Since I'm too tired to type it up myself, NRO News provides a summary of the events that took place on Christmas Day:
A Nigerian national and self-described Al Qaeda affiliate is in federal custody after allegedly trying to explode a Northwest Airlines Flight (253) bound for Detroit, according to news reports.Abdul Farouk Abdulmutallab, twenty-three, reportedly attempted to set off a chemical incendiary device on the Amsterdam-Detroit flight shortly before it landed, but was foiled when fellow passengers smelled smoke and rushed him.
According to a federal counterterrorism official, Abdulmutallab has told authorities in preliminary interviews that he met with Al Qaeda operatives in Yemen to collect the chemical components for the device and learn how to use it. Authorities also said that Abdulmutallab appears in government records as a terrorism suspect, though he was not on the Transportation Safety Authority's "no-fly" list.
An analysis in the Telegraph asks the obvious questions:
How can a Muslim student, whose name appears on a US law enforcement database, be granted a visa to travel to America, allegedly acquire an explosive device from Yemen, a country awash with al-Qaeda terrorists, and avoid detection from the world's most sophisticated spy agencies?
There's much, much, more in the news that I'm sure you've read and so I won't rehash it. Long story short, this guy should have never made it onto the airplane;
Let's hope that this puts the brakes on attempts to end Bush-era security measures. Yes, Virginia, there is a threat, and it is real. No it is not a police problem best met through a law-enforcement model. And can we please have a real investigation into why in the world we didn't stop this guy before he got on the plane?
Incredibly, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano says that the system worked:
(transcript here, via American Power)
Napoliano: "...And one thing I'd like to point out is that the system worked...This was one individual literally of thousands that fly and thousands of flights every year. And he was stopped before any damage could be done... he was on what's called a tied list, which has half-a-million-plus names on it"
Fire this woman now.
Our "system" didn't do squat. We got lucky this time. It was a Dutch film producer that stopped the terrorist, not anyone from Homeland Security. She also insinuates that because he was on a list with a "half-a-million-plus names on it" is somehow an excuse, as if that's too big for modern computers to handle. To her credit, it didn't seem like CNN host Candy Crowley was buying her answers.
Thomas Joscelyn lets her have it with both barrels:
The would-be Christmas Day bomber boarded a plane with an explosive device that may have been capable of destroying an airliner, and yet "the system worked"? One wonders: What would it take for the "system" to fail? And if Abdulmutallab was not "improperly screened," then what is the point to screening anyone at all?As far as we can tell according to the press accounts thus far, there are two reasons Abdulmutallab failed in his attempt at mass murder. Neither reason has anything to do with the "system."
First, Abdulmutallab's explosive device may have had a faulty detonator. Second, alert passengers pounced on Abdulmutallab, thereby preventing him from trying to rectify the problem, but only after Abdulmutallab had already started a fire on the plane.
Again, neither of these reasons for Mutallab's failure has anything to do with the "system."
In fact, contrary to what Napolitano says, there are an increasing number of "suggestion(s)" that the "system" failed miserably. Abdulmutallab's father says he contacted the U.S. embassy to warn American officials about his son's radicalism weeks ago. If true, and he still wasn't prevented from getting on an American-bound airliner, then this was a "system" failure. According to this account from CBS News, U.S. officials knew about Abdulmutallab for two years and while he was not on the no-fly list (a failure in and of itself), he was "on a list that includes people with known or suspected contact or ties to a terrorist or terrorist organization."
So, how did the "system" work if U.S. officials were warned about Abdulmutallab by his father, after knowing about him for two years, and yet didn't manage to do anything to stop him?
One of the most disappointing outcomes of 9-11 was that almost no one in the Administration was fired. That FDR didn't fire anyone after Pearl Harbor but scapegoated the commanders in Hawaii was no excuse. Heads should roll at DHS, starting with Napolitano's.
To those who think that everything is fine since, hey, we arrested the guy, Andy McCarthy has the perfect rejoinder
In Willful Blindness, I recount the debacle of repeated entries into the United States by, among others, the Blind Sheikh (Omar Abdel Rahman) and al Qaeda operative Ali Mohammed -- the former permitted free entrance, egress and, finally, a green card (as a special religious worker) even though he was one of the world's most famous jihadists and was on the terror watch lists for having authorized the murder of Anwar Sadat; the latter permitted to immigrate from Egypt and join the U.S. army despite having been caught trying to infiltrate the CIA. Now, nearly 20 years later -- after 9/11, the 9/11 Commission, etc. -- we have Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab: He was in the terrorist "database" because we were warned by his own influential father of his radical ties and proclivities, and he was evidently notorious among associates in Africa and Europe for his jihadist leanings; yet, he was issued a multiple-entry visa. And he claims to have been trained in Yemen -- the al Qaeda hub to which the administration has just sent a half-dozen trained jihadists previously detained in Gitmo, and where it hopes to send many more. ...Hadn't Abdulmutallab heard that we are closing Gitmo? Hadn't he heard that we're phasing out military-commissions so we can show the world that we give even the worst mass-murderers civilian trials with all the rights of American citizens? Hadn't he heard that President Obama has banned torture (yes, yes, I know, actually Congress banned it 15 years ago -- details, details ...)? Hadn't he heard that the president has called for "a new beginning" in America's relationship with the Muslim world? Hadn't he heard that this is our new, smarter strategy to safeguard the nation from man-caused disasters?
I suspect he's heard all those things.
The blind Sheikh as the mastermind behind the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, and McCarthy was the chief prosecutor at his trial.
Finally, let me swat down one thing we're likely to hear from those who will deny that there is a large threat; that because Umar Farouk Abdul Mudalladalone (assuming he did), this was just an isolated incident and it's nothing much to worry about.
I don't have time now to go through the whole thing, but suffice it to say that al Qaeda is not the mafia or Nazi Germany. It is as much a concept, or mindset, as it is a formal organization. al Qaeda doesn't want to terrorize anyone or gain anything for it's own sake, but rather to reestablish the Caliphate by way or destroying Western civilization. The ideology seeks to inspire Muslims to commit acts of violent jihad as a means to this end. Whether they are formally working for the organization or not is irrelevant. In this sense, Walid Phares is right when he says it's all part of a War of Ideas.
As it is, Umar Farouk Abdul Mudallad reportedly "said he received instructions and training from al Qaeda operatives based in Yemen ahead of boarding the Detroit-bound flight Friday," so we shall see.
Whatever else, both we and other countries need to reexamine their security protocols and fast.
Posted by Tom at December 27, 2009 9:30 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/1498
Comments
Good morning, Tom -- it is still morning here in the Pacific Northwest.
Yes, I agree, we do need to change our securtiy protocols not only quickly, but radically. However, I don't blame Napolitano any more than I blame Bush for not finding any weapons of mass destruction or for not catching the kingpin Bin Laden who keeps inspiring these malcontents that won't do anything except bring down their own civilization. They are a slithering, sneaky bunch that take advantage of the lack of enough well-trained security peaple and the lack of new technology to see what they are carrying in their shoes or on their bodies before they enter planes or buildings.
Already in China they are using the new technology that, in order to expedite "frisking" of passengers, they just use a machine that sees right through their clothes. I wouldn't mind that---I already was "felt up" under my blouse once because the underwires in my bra kept making their frisking "wand" go off. Modest in the face of my own security I am not.
The security people apologized for frisking me like that, and prior to it they asked if I wanted to step into a room off to the side. I refused, not wanting to be delayed any longer, so my frisking took place in view of other passengers, who probably felt relieved that they didn't find anything suspicious on me. For a while I wore no underwear and only a jumpsuit and sandals, and for years now the underwires don't make anything go off, so maybe things are getting too relaxed security-wise.
However, I am afraid that too many conservative people would object to losing another "freedom" or would have the false modesty of not wanting their bodies seen through their clothes, or that lazy, distracted poorly trained security people would let something slip by.
Ever since 9-11, my husband and I have been unusually delayed at check-in even before we got to the screeners. They would take our ID's and go into another room, then they would come back and check us in. In September I found out the reason for the delays: we were at SEA-TAC airport and the fellow couldn't sign us in on his computer. He couldn't figure out what was wrong. Finally his supervisor came over and showed him that there was a "flag" on the computer screen (what kind of training do they get or not get?).
I demanded to know what "flag" there was, and they finally told me that my husband is on a "no fly" list. My husband's name is Antonio Garcia, as common a name as Ted Kennedy, who also was on a "no fly" list. Yes, my husband, former Marine, Korean War Vet, whose father was also a Marine in WWII and fought at Quajilain [sp] in the Pacific--forever to be delayed because of his name.
What happens is that they have other computers that only supervisors use, I guess, in another room, where they have to clear us by looking up the photo. description, birthdate, birthplace, etc. of the supposed terrorist with the same name as my husband. When they are sure my husband is not the one and the same, they send us on our way with apologies.
When we got to our cousin's house in Las Cruces, New Mexico, he told us that he too is on a "no fly" list. His name is Manuel Lopez, another very common name. He was in the Air Force during the Viet Nam war. I wish they would put the Muslims on those lists instead of good patriotic Americans.
So, yes, expedite the changes to protocols, and don't let the wimps say that it is a violation of our privacy to be seen in the nude before we board a plane. Had they gone over this latest nut with that new machine, they would have seen the contraption he had strapped to his chest and leg, etc.
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
Posted by: Emilie at December 28, 2009 2:16 PM
Bush era policies are still in place I believe Tom. This creep just made it through somehow.
I concede that Napolitano deserves firing after her silly statement. We got lucky.
Posted by: Truth 101 at December 28, 2009 6:54 PM
Emilie,
Kwajalein Atoll is part of what is now The Republic of the Marshall Islands. Occupied by the Japanese, Kwajalein was taken by American forces in a battle beginning January 31, 1944 and ending February 6, 1944
Kwajalein was one of the few locations in the Pacific war where Islanders were killed while actually fighting for the Japanese.
Of the 8,782 Japanese personnel deployed to the atoll (including Korean laborers), it has been argued that only 2,200 were combat trained. Despite this likelihood, Japanese resistance was strong and resilient, even given the fact that Japanese troops were outnumbered by tens of thousands of American troops. By the end of the battle, 373 Americans were killed, 7,870 "Japanese" were killed, and an estimated 200 Marshallese were killed.
If your husband's father was part of the 4th Marine Division, he actually land on Roi-Namur, another island on the north side of the atoll.
TLGK
Posted by: The Loop Garoo Kid at December 29, 2009 12:04 PM
TLGK,
Yes, my husband says that his father was either in the 4th or 5th Marine Division. He was sent first to New Zealand for training after boot camp in Camp Pendleton, but for some reason my husband remembers that name Kwajalein, where they cleared the place of the enemy, as they did other islands, then the Army came in to secure them, then the Navy SeeBees would come and build air-strips so that our bombers could get closer and closer to Japan to more easily bomb the Japanese. His dad's last battle was at Okinawa, then he got to come home. He may not have gotten to come home had not Pres. Truman sent in the planes carrying the ultimate weapon to end the war without anymore loss of American lives.
I see they are talking more about having those new machines at airports that can see through peoples' clothes. I think that is the only solution to keep these suicide bombers off planes.
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
Posted by: Emilie at December 29, 2009 6:01 PM
Emilie,
The name of the entire atoll is Kwajalein. Kwajalein is one of the world's largest coral atolls as measured by area of enclosed water. Comprising 97 islands and islets, it has a land area of 6.33 mi², and surrounds one of the largest lagoons in the world, with an area of 839 mi².
Kwajalein island is the largest and southern most of the atoll while Roi-Namur is the second largest and on the north end.
So it is as if your husband's father stated that he invaded New York City when he landed in the Bronx, which is part of NYC.
TLGK
Posted by: The Loop Garoo Kid at December 30, 2009 1:17 PM



