« Obama's Nuclear Free Fantasy World | Main | Finger-Pointing on Pace of the Surge for Afghanistan? »

January 8, 2010

Invented Outrage Over Brit Hume's Tiger Woods & Christianity Remark

I'm a bit late in posting on this subject, but I do try and have a life outside blogging.

Here's the remark by Brit Hume that's driving some people nuts:

Transcript of Hume's "offending" remark:

Whether he can recover as a person depends on "his faith. He's said to be a Buddhist. I don't think that faith offers the kind of forgiveness and redemption that is offered by the Christian faith. So my message to Tiger would be, "Tiger, turn to the Christian faith and you can make a total recovery and be a great example to the world."

I'm not surprised that some are "outraged!" but that doesn't make their "outrage" any more justifiable (google around for examples). Hume simply said what most Christians think. Mirror image it and he said what anyone of any religion thinks.


As I heard Hume point out on the Laura Ingraham show earlier this week, suppose he had suggested that Woods adopt practices of Buddhism, Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, or transcendental meditation? Do you think the left would have reacted in the same way? Of course not.

Brit Hume is not a public official, so what's the big deal? If it was a mayor speaking while chairing the local town council meeting, ok, I get it. But this was not that.

Further, he was not acting as a news anchor, and he didn't say it in the middle of a news broadcast. He retired from that role a few years ago. He was there are a commentator.

Basically, a Christian went on TV and said that Christianity is the best religion. Muslims think theirs is the best religion, and so on. That Hume said this on a news show rather than a religious channel makes no difference to me.

Here is the issue, there are militant anti-Christians who cannot stand to even hear anything that challenges their beliefs. They've gone beyond preventing government from promoting a particular religion to demanding that it be totally absent from the public sphere.

Sister Toldjah says it best (and I owe much else in this post to her as well):

There are those who don't believe in Jesus but who also don't have any issues with a public discussion about Christianity because they understand that many of the tenets of the tradition Christian faith are parallel in nature to what used to be standard, widely held general beliefs about what the basics of right and wrong, good and bad - regardless of faith. Not only that, but they recognize that there is nothing wrong in believing in a calling bigger than ourselves. Those people I can respect. The people I have very little respect for are

1) non-believers who scream in outrage at the first criticism of Islam but who are the first ones in line to throw mud at Christians - and who are the first ones to falsely claim that Christians can be "just as bad - or worse" than the "tiny minority" of extremist Islamists who live in the world),

2) so-called "believers" who believe that the discussion of faith and religion should be limited to the church and the privacy of your home (did someone tell Jesus this?), and

3) "believers" who twist the word of God into something that it is not in order to justify their political beliefs ("Jesus was a liberal!").

As usual, any time anyone utters the word "Christian" and "faith" in the same sentence - especially when it's involved in a discussion where it's being compared in what some would see in a negative way to another belief system, the left treats it as though someone has kicked a kitten, pushed an elderly lady in front of a transit bus, and/or burned the Constitution. It's "outrageous," it's "worthy of contempt," it has "no place in the public debate," it's "demeaning to other faiths," etc etc. Yet, they have no problems themselves routinely condemning and smearing the Christian faith. In fact, if the left had their way, it wouldn't just be government officials who were Christians who had to be politically correct when referring to different religions; commentators who favored Christianity over other religions would have to, too.

Ditto that, Sister.

In the end, though, we can't say we weren't warned:

2 Timothy 3:12 In fact, everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted

Luke 21:12
But before all this, they will lay hands on you and persecute you. They will deliver you to synagogues and prisons, and you will be brought before kings and governors, and all on account of my name.

John 15:20
Remember the words I spoke to you: 'No servant is greater than his master.' If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also.

2 Timothy 3:12
In fact, everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted,

Hebrews 10:32-33
Remember those earlier days after you had received the light, when you stood your ground in a great contest in the face of suffering. 33Sometimes you were publicly exposed to insult and persecution; at other times you stood side by side with those who were so treated.

...and many more.

Posted by Tom at January 8, 2010 9:15 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/1506

Comments

Tom: Brit has every right to "suggest" Christianity as a "saving grace". It's the religion of "his" choice. For others to get "outraged" is just silly.

Here's how I interpreted it: Brit said, "Tiger, turn to the (Insert faith here) faith and you can make a total recovery and be a great example to the world."

I think people need to lighten up a little. I'm sure Brit meant to disrespect to all the other religions out there.

Posted by: Pamela D. Hart at January 8, 2010 10:27 PM

The man who has usurped the WH without submitting his proof of eligibility stated that the USA is a Muslim country. Where was the outrage when BHO said that?? And keeps "talking up" the Muslim religion??

BHO isn't long for the WH. The USA isn't long to remain a nation.

There is a God in Heaven - who founded the USA as a Christian nation.

The most ignorant among us think they get to "vote in" who sits on the Throne of Heaven. God doesn't need our vote. He created us. He's God over the land of the USA whether the left or Obama likes it or not - and God doesn't need their votes to bring the USA to ashes and raise up a new Christian nation on this land arising from the ashes.

That's my view. Brit Hume owes no one an apology.

Posted by: laura at January 8, 2010 11:10 PM

Hi Tom,
Can't disagree with your post.People seem to manufacture outrage at times,like a coach needing bulletin board material. Sometimes I cringe when I see things that swirl around the blogosphere. As a liberal - sorry I snuck in when your security guards were changing shifts:)- I can easily come up with solid arguments against conservative positions on issues, as your side can come up with them against ours.

But dumb arguments, or "reaches" like this one IMO tend to reinforce negative perceptions of each other.

Later Tom

Posted by: Oso at January 9, 2010 5:19 PM

Oh my! My last sentence should've read: I'm sure Brit meant NO DISRESPECT!

Next time I'll double check before I post!

Posted by: Pamela D. Hart at January 9, 2010 6:20 PM

snake hunters sez:

"In America, we must have a multiplicity of religious sects...so that no one sect can become
a majority...to oppress and persecute the rest."

James Madison

Posted by: Ralph E at January 9, 2010 7:57 PM

Thank you everyone for stopping by.

Oso - I don't restrict comments to conservatives. Anyone can comment as long as they adhere to basic rules of decorum.

Posted by: Tom the Redhunter at January 10, 2010 9:14 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)